What Does it Mean to ‘Waste’ Community Assets in Divorce?

Anne B. Bennette, Edmonds Lawyer

When a spouse files a Petition for Dissolution or Legal Separation, Courts often issue an ‘Automatic Temporary Order Setting Financial Restraints.’

This is intended to prohibit either party from spending funds beyond those in the ‘usual course of business’ or for the ‘basic necessities of life.’  The point of the Court entering such an order is to prevent either party from hiding, wasting, or disbursing assets that the Court has jurisdiction to divide.  In a divorce or separation action, the Court has jurisdiction to divide both separate and community property, so the order applies to all assets and debts whether individually or jointly held. 

While there is no specific definition of ‘waste’ in this context, Washington courts have characterized waste as “negatively productive conduct, gross fiscal improvidence, the squandering of marital assets, or the deliberate and unnecessary incurring of tax liabilities.” In re Marriage of Clark, 13 Wn. App. 805, 808-09, 538 P.2d 145 (1975); In re Marriage of Steadman, 63 Wn. App. 523, 528, 821 P.2d 59 (1991).

As these financial restraints are broad, it is important to be transparent and to exercise sound judgment when using community or separate funds while a dissolution action is pending.  It is always a good idea to consult with the other party when considering a big expense and be specific about the cost. 

For example, if a party’s car breaks down, it is reasonable to ask for new vehicle as a ‘basic necessity of life.’  It is important to be thoughtful about the type of vehicle purchased and up front with the opposing party about the purchase. It may be considered a violation of the order if one spouse purchased an expensive luxury sports car when a reasonably priced sedan would serve the same purpose.  Even if the other party agreed to the purchase of a vehicle, if  they did not authorize the purchase of an expensive luxury car, this may very well be a violation of the order.  This can result in a contempt finding, a judgment against that spouse, and an award of attorney’s fees.   

The Lawyers at Beresford Booth Are Worth Your Time

When choosing a lawyer, consider these factors and take the time to interview multiple candidates. Ask about their experience, fees, and approach to cases. Ask the best way to communicate with them. Trust your instincts and choose a lawyer who you feel both comfortable with and confident in.

Serving Washington Since 1946

Beresford Booth lawyers are experienced, dedicated professionals, prepared to answer your questions and guide you through the process based on your needs and goals. As a result of our experience, we provide you practical advice and set reasonable expectations for the process.  Together, we develop and implement a case strategy based on your goals. Beresford Booth is a Primerus law firm. Primerus is an international society of top-rated independent law firms. 

Family law disputes can be stressful and emotional. Our family law group can take some of the weight off your shoulders. To request a consultation, please contact Beresford Booth at info@beresfordlaw.com or by phone at (425) 776-4100.

BERESFORD BOOTH has made this content available to the general public for informational purposes only. The information on this site is not intended to convey legal opinions or legal advice.