Recent News

Corporation vs. LLC Judicial Dissolution Claims in Washington

Washington State Business Lawyer Caleb J. Tingstad | 10/19/2026
In disputes between business owners, a co-owner will commonly assert a claim for judicial dissolution. However, business owners and practitioners must be aware of the significant differences between Washington’s standards for judicial dissolution between different business entity types. The most common business entities in Washington include LLCs and corporations, but the statutory scheme behind judicial… Read More

Protecting Earnout Value When the Seller Steps Down

Washington State Business Lawyer C. Michael Kvistad | 10/13/2026
This is Part 2 of a two-part series on structuring and enforcing earnouts in middle-market M&A transactions. If you missed it, read Part 1: Revenue vs. EBITDA: Choosing the Right Earnout Metric to see how setting the right financial targets impacts the deal. When a merger or acquisition utilizes an earnout to bridge a valuation… Read More

Structuring Deals Around Washington’s 2027 REET Shifts

Washington State Business Lawyer C. Michael Kvistad | 10/13/2026
In one of my previous posts, What the 2027 Washington Real Estate Excise Tax Shifts Mean for You, I broke down the statutory rate tier adjustments taking effect under RCW 82.45.060 on January 1, 2027. While those upward bracket shifts may provide meaningful tax savings on higher-value properties, Washington’s Real Estate Excise Tax (“REET”) structure… Read More

Revenue vs. EBITDA: Choosing the Right Earnout Metric

Washington State Business Lawyer C. Michael Kvistad | 10/13/2026
This is Part 1 of a two-part series on structuring and enforcing earnouts in middle-market M&A transactions. Part 2 focuses on post-closing operational covenants and governance. When negotiating an earnout in a middle-market M&A transaction, choosing the underlying metric is one of the most critical decisions both parties will make. The two primary choices, gross… Read More

Earnouts: A Creative Solution or a Recipe for Post-Closing Disputes?

Washington State Business Lawyer Andrew J. Tingstad | 10/5/2026
Earnout provisions are among the most creative and, simultaneously, the most litigated structures in M&A transactions. When a buyer and seller cannot agree on purchase price because they disagree about the future performance of the business, an earnout can bridge the gap—allowing the seller to receive additional consideration if the business achieves agreed-upon milestones after… Read More

(Updated) Inside Baseball: Business Dispute Limits Youth Baseball Events & Highlights the Importance of Proper Business Planning

Beresford Booth | 9/22/2026
[NOTE: This blog entry originally published on September 3, 2026, has been updated to address new developments in the case.] The King County Superior Court’s recent rulings in favor of the plaintiff in an unfair competition business dispute (Elysian One, Inc. v. Evasick et al., No. 24-2-27142-2 SEA) will have a major impact on the… Read More

Asset Deal vs. Stock Deal: Choosing the Right Structure and Why It Matters More Than the Purchase Price

Washington State Business Lawyer Andrew J. Tingstad | 9/3/2026
When a buyer and seller agree on a purchase price, many people assume the hard part of the negotiation is over. In reality, some of the most consequential decisions in any M&A transaction are made after the headline number is set—starting with the fundamental question of deal structure. Whether the transaction is structured as an… Read More