Recent News

Disclosure Duties Of Real Estate Brokers

Washington State Real Estate Law Lawyer Andrew M. McKenzie | 1/20/2021
Most people with some experience in real estate transactions are aware of a seller’s duties generally to disclose to the buyer adverse material facts about the property being sold.  But what duties do brokers have in this regard?  Washington law imposes on brokers certain non-waivable duties owed “to all parties to whom the broker renders… Read More

Complex Real Estate Issues? We Help You And Your Agent Close The Deal

Washington State Business & Real Estate Lawyer William O. Kessler | 1/19/2021
When buying or selling residential or commercial real estate, the transaction can be mercifully simple- you work with your agent to sign the Purchase and Sale Agreement, work through lending and escrow, and sign a pile of paper to close. But it isn’t always simple: Is my fence on my neighbor’s lot? Do my neighbor’s… Read More

Washington State Revamps COVID Recovery Plan

Washington State Business & Real Estate Lawyer Todd J. Cook | 1/14/2021
Washington State has been on a long road to recovery ever since Governor Jay Inslee first issued his original “Stay Home-Stay Heathy” proclamation on March 23, 2020.  The Governor has now amended his original Stay Home order twelve times.  The last two amendments saw the Governor begin to rollback the “County by County Phased Reopening”… Read More

A Friendly Reminder: You And Your LLC Are Different

Washington State Business and Real Estate Lawyer David C. Tingstad | 1/13/2021
Individuals regularly hold their real estate in LLCs for many reasons, including asset protection, because an LLC is a “separate legal entity” RCW 25.15.071 (3) and members are not liable for debts of the LLC RCW 25.15.126 (1).  The distinction between an individual member and an LLC was front and center in a recent Washington… Read More

Carefully Drafting ….or Else!

Washington State Business and Real Estate Lawyer David C. Tingstad | 1/6/2021
Draft carefully, because ambiguous drafting may leave you at the mercy of default rules of the LLC Act.  A recent Wisconsin Supreme Court decision, Marx v. Morris, 925 N.W.2d 112 (Wisc. 2019), illustrates the need for careful drafting. The Case’s Significance Before delving into the facts and dispute arising out of Marx, it is important… Read More

Members vs. Transferees

Washington State Business and Real Estate Lawyer David C. Tingstad | 12/16/2020
In last week’s post, I identified some of the key distinctions when one holds an interest in an LLC, but is not a member (see here).  Members and transferees hold different rights. This post seeks to further explore the similarities and differences between members and transferees. Rights of Members and Transferees Members and transferees share… Read More

You Hold An Interest In An LLC, But Are You A Member?

Washington State Business and Real Estate Lawyer David C. Tingstad | 12/9/2020
You may have heard that “membership has its privileges.”  But what if a person has an interest in an LLC but is not a member?  In general, such a person is a “transferee” and holds only a “transferable interest.” Transferable Interest Defined Under RCW 25.15.006(20) a transferable interest “means a member’s or transferee’s right to… Read More

Just Because Oral Agreements Are Allowed, Does Not Mean You Should Use Them

Washington State Business and Real Estate Lawyer David C. Tingstad | 12/2/2020
In Washington, partnerships may be formed without a written agreement.  In 2016, Washington amended its LLC Act (RCW 25.15 et seq.) to allow oral LLC agreements. However, just because you can have oral partnership and LLC agreements does not mean you should—this is the lesson learned from the recent Washington Court of Appeals case, Samra… Read More

Derivative Actions And LLCs

Washington State Business and Real Estate Lawyer David C. Tingstad | 11/25/2020
This post keeps with the theme developed over the past couple weeks of derivative actions, this time in their application to limited liability companies. Interestingly, Washington’s Division Three Court of Appeals threw practitioners a “derivative action curveball” in the 2016 opinion Holman v. Brady, No. 33114-8-III, 2016 WL 4921457 (Wn. App. Sep. 13, 2016). This… Read More