Two Red Flags Hidden Inside Indemnification Clauses

C. Michael Kvistad Edmonds Lawyer

This is Part 2 of my four‑part series on indemnification clauses. In Part 1, we looked at what indemnification is and why it matters; here, we focus on specific red flags I routinely see in Washington contracts.

Indemnification clauses are rarely written in plain English. They’re dense, technical, and often intentionally broad. But buried inside them are red flags that every Washington business owner should be able to spot.

Here are the two that show up most often in the contracts I review. These are also areas where a lawyer can add immediate value by narrowing, clarifying, or re‑balancing the language before you sign, regardless of whether you’re the party giving or receiving indemnity.

1. “Any and All Claims”

This phrase sounds harmless, but it can mean:

  • Claims you didn’t cause
  • Claims outside your control
  • Claims unrelated to your work

If you see “any and all,” ask what the clause is really trying to cover. Often, it’s far more than the risk you intended to take on.

2. Duty to Defend

Many indemnification clauses include a duty to defend, meaning you must pay for the other party’s legal defense immediately, even before fault is determined.

That can mean tens of thousands of dollars in attorney fees before the case even gets started.

What to Do

Slow down, read carefully, and bring your lawyer into the conversation before signing. Indemnification is not a “boilerplate” throw‑in, it’s a core risk‑allocation tool. Having a lawyer review, explain, and, where needed, renegotiate these clauses is one of the most cost‑effective investments a business can make.

To learn more about indemnification clauses, please contact Beresford Booth at info@beresfordlaw.com or by phone at (425) 776-4100.

BERESFORD BOOTH has made this content available to the general public for informational purposes only. The information on this site is not intended to convey legal opinions or legal advice.